ScamLens analyzed malancer.com using 90+ threat intelligence sources and assigned a trust score of 82/100, classifying it as safe.
Trust Score: 82/100
Risk Level: Trusted
This result is still in the investigation range, so the domain alone is not enough for a decision. The next step is to cross-check the email, phone number, company identity, and scenario.
Quick Answer
This result is still in the investigation range, so the domain alone is not enough for a decision. The next step is to cross-check the email, phone number, company identity, and scenario.
Positive Signals
- + Google Safe Browsing: Safe
- + HTTPS encryption supported
- + 15/15 security sources confirmed safe
Concerns
- - Domain registered only 9 day ago
Score Breakdown
Was this assessment accurate?
malancer.com looks legitimate
No threat feeds have flagged this domain. Use standard online-safety habits.
- Bookmark the official URLScammers often clone legitimate brands at look-alike domains. A saved bookmark protects you from typos.
- Watch for unexpected payment requestsEven legitimate sites can be hijacked. Treat unsolicited 'urgent payment' prompts as suspicious.
- Verify HTTPS + the exact spellingConfirm the lock icon, and inspect the domain letter-by-letter before entering passwords or card details.
Trust but verify — open this domain on unrelated security services and compare the verdict.
AI Risk Assessment
SafeWhat matters right now
This is the easiest range to misread. Do not rely on the domain alone. Cross-check the email, phone number, company identity, and transaction context together.
malancer.com presents mixed signals. [FACT] Safe Browsing is clean 1 and 26 of 27 threat feeds are clean 3, but [FACT] one threat feed (shodan_internetdb) flagged it for RISKY_INFRASTRUCTURE 2. [FACT] The domain is extremely new—registered 5 days ago 4—which is a strong suspicion indicator for legitimate services 4. [FACT] The .com TLD carries low abuse risk 5, and [FACT] no brand impersonation or homograph attacks were detected [provided data]. [INFERENCE] The single infrastructure flag combined with the very recent registration age (under 7 days) suggests heightened caution despite the majority of feeds being clean. The infrastructure flag may indicate misconfigured hosting or network exposure rather than active malicious content, but legitimacy cannot be confirmed at this early stage.
Recommendation
Exercise caution. [INFERENCE] Verify the domain's purpose and legitimacy through independent channels before sharing credentials or financial information. Monitor for updates from threat feeds over the next 30 days, as newly registered domains often gain reputation signals over time. If this is your own domain, review your hosting configuration to resolve the RISKY_INFRASTRUCTURE flag.
Sources
- Threat intelligence feeds (1 flagged)Threat intel
shodan_internetdb (RISKY_INFRASTRUCTURE)
- 26/27 threat feeds responded cleanThreat intel
- WHOIS registration dataWHOIS
Registered 2026-06-07T18:17:39Z (5 days ago), registrar: NameSilo, LLC
- TLD risk classification: .com (low risk)Analysis
Based on APWG / Spamhaus / Interisle 2024 abuse rankings
Powered by ScamLens AI· Check sources to verify important claims
Threat-intelligence sources
Checked across 27 sources — no flags raised
Show source breakdown
Threat-intelligence sources
Checked across 27 sources — no flags raised
- safe_browsing clean
- urlhaus clean
- cloudflare_radar clean
- cert_transparency clean
- alienvault_otx clean
- phishstats clean
- virustotal clean
- ipqs clean
- abuseipdb clean
- securitytrails clean
- phishdestroy clean
- threatfox clean
- shodan_internetdb clean
- phishtank clean
- urlscan clean
- rdap clean
- maltiverse clean
- dns_security clean
- wanted_domains clean
- darkweb clean
- openphish clean
- scam_blocklist clean
- maltrail clean
- crypto_scam_feed clean
- phishing_army clean
- hagezi_tif clean
- red_flag_domains clean
ScamLens aggregates real-time signals from 90+ commercial and open-source threat-intelligence providers including Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, PhishTank, URLhaus, ThreatFox, Cloudflare Radar, OTX, IPQS, GoPlus, Honeypot.is, and more. A flagged signal is evidence; the absence of flags is not proof of safety. Use the signals below alongside community reports to decide.
Advanced Scan
Comprehensive data lookup across premium sources
- Website history verification
- Detailed WHOIS information
- Reverse WHOIS association
- Traffic rank analysis
- Company registration check
AI Deep Investigation
Cross-check the story, claims, and supporting evidence before you decide
- Everything in Advanced Scan
- AI website content analysis
- AI cross-reference verification
- Claim authenticity validation
- Detailed report with evidence
Comprehensive Investigation
Full-spectrum investigation with company deep search & social intelligence
- Everything in Deep Investigation
- AI company background search
- Social media intelligence
- Detailed suspicious point analysis
- Event timeline & entity connections
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a legal determination.
Security Sources
Domain Information
- Registrar
- NameSilo, LLC
- Created
- June 7, 2026
- Expires
- June 7, 2027
- Domain Age
- 9 days
- DNSSEC
- Disabled
- Nameservers
- NS1.CAPCONNECT.COM, NS2.CAPCONNECT.COM, NS3.CAPCONNECT.COM, NS4.CAPCONNECT.COM
- Domain Status
- client transfer prohibited
SSL/TLS Certificate
No data available
Server Information
- IP Address
- 185.27.134.60
- Hosting Provider
- UK-IFASTNET
- ASN
- AS34119 Wildcard UK Limited
- Server Location
- Gosforth, United Kingdom
- Organization
- I FastNet LTD
Related Intelligence
Technical Details (DNS / Headers / Subdomains)
DNS Records
Email Security
SPF Configured DMARC Configured| Type | Value |
|---|---|
| A | 185.27.134.60 |
| MX | 0 malancer.com |
| NS | ns3.capconnect.com |
| NS | ns4.capconnect.com |
| NS | ns1.capconnect.com |
| NS | ns2.capconnect.com |
| TXT | firebase=malancer-1cbd5 |
| TXT | v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:49.13.222.116 ~all |
| TXT | v=spf1 include:_spf.firebasemail.com ~all |
HTTP Security Headers
0/6Channels / Subdomains
No data available
Community Reports
Log in to report and share your experience
Continue Investigating
The result is still in the investigation range. Cross-check the email, phone, and entity data next
Medium-risk domains are easiest to misread when you only check one signal. The decision gets more reliable once you cross-check the email, phone number, company identity, and business scenario together.
Recommended First
Analyze the related email or invoice
Confirm whether the billing notice, restriction alert, or support email actually matches the site.
Check the company or seller identity
Compare the domain against the company identity, merchant profile, or hiring details.
Check the related phone number
If the actor wants a callback, phone verification, or one-time code readout, verify that number next.
Open the matching scenario guide
If the case involves investing, shopping, or recovery services, verify it through the matching scenario guide.
The results are based on multiple third-party data sources and AI models. False positives or negatives may occur. This report should not be used as the sole basis for any decision. Please verify with additional sources.
Verify the related evidence objects first
Medium-risk cases are easiest to misread when you only check one signal. Verify the email, phone, and entity before deciding whether to report or stop the transaction.
If you already paid or exposed account access, skip the investigation loop and move into the action plan.
Related Security Guides
Learn more about how to protect yourself from this type of threat.
FAQ
Is malancer.com safe to visit?
malancer.com received a trust score of 82/100 from ScamLens, based on analysis of 30+ threat intelligence sources. No significant threats were detected. The site appears safe and trustworthy.
Was malancer.com flagged by any threat databases?
malancer.com was checked against 30+ threat intelligence databases including Google Safe Browsing, PhishTank, and URLhaus. No threats were detected across any source.
How old is malancer.com?
malancer.com was first registered on June 7, 2026, making it approximately 9 days old. Domains less than 30 days old are statistically more likely to be associated with fraudulent activity.
Does malancer.com use HTTPS and have a valid SSL certificate?
ScamLens could not verify the SSL certificate details for malancer.com during this scan. Treat this as unavailable evidence, not as proof that the site is safe or unsafe.
What security headers does malancer.com implement?
malancer.com is missing important security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Strict-Transport-Security, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. Missing security headers can leave visitors vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and other web-based attacks.
What does the ScamLens community think about malancer.com?
No community votes or reports have been submitted for malancer.com yet. You can be the first to share your experience.
Where is malancer.com hosted?
malancer.com is hosted by UK-IFASTNET in Gosforth, United Kingdom (ASN: ASAS34119 Wildcard UK Limited).
What should I do about malancer.com?
Exercise caution. [INFERENCE] Verify the domain's purpose and legitimacy through independent channels before sharing credentials or financial information. Monitor for updates from threat feeds over the next 30 days, as newly registered domains often gain reputation signals over time. If this is your own domain, review your hosting configuration to resolve the RISKY_INFRASTRUCTURE flag.
Is this report useful?
Use this report to prompt others to keep cross-checking the email, phone number, and entity details instead of clearing it too early.
Forward to your parents — they deserve to browse safely too.
About this analysis
This report is generated from real-time data across 90+ threat intelligence sources, combined with AI analysis and community feedback.
Learn about our scoring methodology | Last analyzed: June 17, 2026