ScamLens

Editorial Policy

2026-04-01

ScamLens publishes anti-scam guidance to help people judge risk, preserve evidence, and choose safer next steps. We aim to keep explanations practical, evidence-based, and clear about what a page can and cannot prove.

What we publish

We publish website, wallet, message, and scam-pattern guidance for consumers and institutional users who need fast risk assessment.

We also publish recovery guides, official reporting routes, and brand-impersonation reviews when they can help users avoid loss or preserve evidence.

How pages are reviewed

Important claims should be grounded in inspectable evidence such as page captures, public records, technical indicators, transaction details, or user-submitted artifacts.

Where a conclusion is uncertain, the page should say so directly and focus on what the user should verify next.

How pages are updated

We update guidance when scam tactics, reporting routes, payment behavior, or platform workflows materially change.

High-risk pages should be reviewed more often than low-sensitivity educational content.

Independence and conflicts

ScamLens does not accept paid placement in risk verdicts, reporting flows, or safety recommendations.

Commercial relationships must not change the factual conclusion of a page.