Press and Citation

ScamLens publishes consumer and institutional guidance on suspicious websites, cryptocurrency addresses, phishing messages, fake support flows, payment-recovery steps, and official reporting routes.

For media and research use, the strongest references are usually the specific report page, scam guide, reporting guide, or review page that matches the case you are covering.

When possible, cite the exact ScamLens page you used rather than the homepage. That makes it clearer which evidence, route, or warning signs informed the reference.

If you mention a risk score, quote the page URL, the checked object, and the date you accessed the page.

Send press, research, and partnership questions to [email protected] with the page URL, the case or topic you are covering, and the deadline if one applies.

If the request concerns a possible factual error, use the corrections path and include the evidence you want reviewed.

For publishing standards, update practices, and factual corrections, review the Editorial Policy, Review Standards, and Corrections Policy pages.

Those pages explain how ScamLens frames uncertain cases, updates high-risk guidance, and handles material corrections.