Review Standards
2026-04-01
ScamLens pages are designed to help users decide whether to continue, stop, report, or recover. Our review standards focus on evidence quality, user safety, and clear next-step guidance rather than certainty theater.
Evidence we consider
Depending on the page type, evidence may include domain history, brand impersonation clues, public abuse records, on-chain activity, screenshots, message content, and user reports.
No single signal should be presented as absolute proof when the broader context is still incomplete.
How verdicts are framed
Pages should separate confirmed facts, strong warning signs, and unresolved questions.
When a case cannot be resolved with confidence, the page should explain what the user needs to verify next.
Recovery and reporting guidance
Guidance should prioritize actions that reduce immediate harm first, such as freezing payment paths, preserving evidence, or contacting official channels.
Pages should avoid implying guaranteed recovery or guaranteed safety.
Community and moderation
User-submitted reports can help surface patterns, but they should be treated as one layer of evidence rather than automatic truth.
ScamLens may remove or moderate abusive, unverifiable, or unsafe submissions.